EFCC Seeks Bail Revocation For Ajudua
Last update: February 27, 2026
Disclaimer: This website may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. We only recommend products or services that we personally use and believe will add value to our readers. Your support is appreciated!
EFCC asks Supreme Court to revoke bail granted to Lagos socialite Fred Chijindu Ajudua by the Court of Appeal.
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission has approached the Supreme Court of Nigeria seeking an order to revoke the bail granted to Lagos socialite, Fred Chijindu Ajudua, by the Court of Appeal of Nigeria sitting in Lagos.
In a notice of appeal dated February 20, 2026, and filed at the apex court in Abuja, the anti-graft agency is challenging the entire ruling of the appellate court delivered on January 30, 2026, which admitted Ajudua to bail.
Through its counsel, S.K. Atteh, the EFCC argued that the Court of Appeal erred in law when it dismissed the prosecution’s preliminary objection and proceeded to grant bail to the defendant.
The Commission contended that the appellate court failed to properly interpret an earlier judgment of the Supreme Court delivered on May 9, 2025, in related appeals involving Ajudua.
According to the EFCC, the apex court had effectively foreclosed further consideration of bail when it ordered that the respondent remain in custody pending the speedy trial of the charge.
CBI News reports that the anti-graft agency particularly faulted the Court of Appeal for allegedly holding that the Supreme Court did not order Ajudua’s continued detention, describing the lower court’s position as contrary to the doctrine of judicial hierarchy and the finality of Supreme Court decisions.
At the heart of the dispute is the interpretation of portions of the Supreme Court’s judgment addressing the relationship between jurisdiction and bail.
The EFCC maintained that the appellate court failed to consider passages in the apex court’s decision which, in its view, meant that the issue of bail had been conclusively determined and could not be revisited by any lower court.
It further argued that by granting fresh bail, the appellate court violated Sections 235 and 275(1) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which make decisions of the Supreme Court final and binding on lower courts.
The EFCC also challenged the appellate court’s reliance on Ajudua’s medical report dated November 19, 2025, as constituting changed circumstances warranting bail.
The Commission stated that the defendant had been diagnosed with kidney-related ailments since 1987 and had repeatedly relied on the condition to delay trial since the charge was filed in 2005.
It alleged inconsistencies in medical reports issued by the same consultant and argued that the Court of Appeal failed to properly evaluate the evidence before granting bail.
The agency warned that allowing Ajudua to remain on bail would frustrate the Supreme Court’s directive for a speedy trial, citing an earlier instance in which, despite being on bail, only one prosecution witness was called over an extended period.
Specifically, the EFCC is asking the apex court to revoke the bail granted to Ajudua on January 30, 2026, and restore the trial court’s ruling of November 20, 2025, which refused bail.
No hearing date has yet been fixed at the Supreme Court.
Ajudua is standing trial for allegedly defrauding Palestinian businessman, Zad Abu Zalaf, of $1.043 million.
